# Navidrome Music Server vs Octoprint

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Navidrome Music Server | Octoprint |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 24 414 ✓ | 9 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +656 ✓ | +59 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.64.2 · 23 Sept 2026 ✓ | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Navidrome Music Server scores 80/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.

Navidrome Music Server ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.

If you want the quickest setup, Navidrome Music Server is easier to run; Octoprint needs more configuration.

Navidrome Music Server is growing faster right now (+656 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Navidrome Music Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/navidrome-music-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/navidrome-music-server.md)
- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/navidrome-music-server-vs-octoprint