# Nautilo vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Nautilo | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #49 of 69 in AI Chat | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 180 | 93 286 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +58 012 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | server-image-40194021813-1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 43/100 for Nautilo, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Nautilo.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; Nautilo needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 012 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Nautilo](https://selfhost.directory/project/nautilo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nautilo.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nautilo-vs-omnivoice-studio