NATSvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| NATS | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 20 954 | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +189 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.14.9 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
NATS scores 80/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.
NATS ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
NATS is growing faster right now (+189 stars in 30 days).
NATS details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep NATS, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with