# NATS vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | NATS | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Message Broker | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 20 959 | 118 199 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +194 | +5 840 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.14.9 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 80/100 for NATS, so it is the safer default.

NATS ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 840 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [NATS](https://selfhost.directory/project/nats) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nats.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nats-vs-tradingagents