# NATS vs SketchForge

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | NATS | SketchForge |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Message Broker | #9 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 20 954 ✓ | 1 176 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +189 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.14.9 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.0.3 · 17 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

NATS scores 80/100 against 55/100 for SketchForge, so it is the safer default.

NATS ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for SketchForge.

If you want the quickest setup, SketchForge is easier to run; NATS needs more configuration.

NATS is growing faster right now (+189 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [NATS](https://selfhost.directory/project/nats) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nats.md)
- [SketchForge](https://selfhost.directory/project/sketchforge-3d) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sketchforge-3d.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nats-vs-sketchforge-3d