NATSvsPeerTube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| NATS | PeerTube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 20 954 | 15 375 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +189 | +43 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 13 |
| Latest release | v2.14.9 · 26 Oct 2026 | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
NATS scores 80/100 against 75/100 for PeerTube, so it is the safer default.
NATS ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for PeerTube.
If you want the quickest setup, NATS is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.
NATS is growing faster right now (+189 stars in 30 days).
NATS details →PeerTube details →
Swap a project
Keep NATS, compare it with
Keep PeerTube, compare it with