# NATS vs PanWatch

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | NATS | PanWatch |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Message Broker | #3 of 9 in Fintech |
| GitHub stars | 20 954 ✓ | 2 269 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +192 ✓ | +118 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v2.14.9 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | 0.20.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

NATS scores 80/100 against 62/100 for PanWatch, so it is the safer default.

NATS ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for PanWatch.

If you want the quickest setup, PanWatch is easier to run; NATS needs more configuration.

## Details

- [NATS](https://selfhost.directory/project/nats) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nats.md)
- [PanWatch](https://selfhost.directory/project/panwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/panwatch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nats-vs-panwatch