NATSvsNavidrome Music Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| NATS | Navidrome Music Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Message Broker | #2 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 20 954 | 24 413 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +192 | +655 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 15 |
| Latest release | v2.14.9 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.64.2 · 23 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
NATS and Navidrome Music Server score the same (80/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
NATS ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Navidrome Music Server.
If you want the quickest setup, Navidrome Music Server is easier to run; NATS needs more configuration.
Navidrome Music Server is growing faster right now (+655 stars in 30 days).
NATS details →Navidrome Music Server details →
Swap a project
Keep NATS, compare it with
Keep Navidrome Music Server, compare it with