# nati.ve vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nati.ve | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #21 of 34 in File Management | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 727 | 24 047 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +787 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Kotlin | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 83/100 against 48/100 for nati.ve, so it is the safer default.

temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for nati.ve.

If you want the quickest setup, nati.ve is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+787 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nati.ve](https://selfhost.directory/project/native) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/native.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/native-vs-temporal