# nanocl vs turbocloud-agent

> Two self-hosted [Kubernetes alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/kubernetes), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nanocl | turbocloud-agent |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 ✓ | 35/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #14 of 14 in Platform as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 1 004 ✓ | 21 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | nanocl-0.18.1 · 26 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

nanocl scores 52/100 against 35/100 for turbocloud-agent, so it is the safer default.

nanocl ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for turbocloud-agent.

If you want the quickest setup, turbocloud-agent is easier to run; nanocl needs more configuration.

## Details

- [nanocl](https://selfhost.directory/project/nanocl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nanocl.md)
- [turbocloud-agent](https://selfhost.directory/project/turbocloud-agent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/turbocloud-agent.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nanocl-vs-turbocloud-agent