# nanobot vs PeerTube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nanobot | PeerTube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 49 607 ✓ | 15 376 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 053 ✓ | +44 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 13 |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

nanobot scores 82/100 against 75/100 for PeerTube, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, nanobot is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.

nanobot is growing faster right now (+1 053 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nanobot](https://selfhost.directory/project/nanobot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nanobot.md)
- [PeerTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nanobot-vs-peertube