# nanobot vs OpeniLink Hub

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | nanobot | OpeniLink Hub |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 209 in AI Agents | #34 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 49 607 ✓ | 1 599 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 053 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.1.36 · 18 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

nanobot scores 82/100 against 55/100 for OpeniLink Hub, so it is the safer default.

nanobot ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OpeniLink Hub.

nanobot is growing faster right now (+1 053 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [nanobot](https://selfhost.directory/project/nanobot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nanobot.md)
- [OpeniLink Hub](https://selfhost.directory/project/openilink-hub) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openilink-hub.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/nanobot-vs-openilink-hub