# namer vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | namer | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #19 of 34 in File Management | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 332 | 24 049 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +771 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.19.20 · 25 May 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 82/100 against 49/100 for namer, so it is the safer default.

temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for namer.

If you want the quickest setup, namer is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+771 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [namer](https://selfhost.directory/project/namer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/namer.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/namer-vs-temporal