# namer vs Pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | namer | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #19 of 34 in File Management | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 332 | 61 541 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +497 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.19.20 · 25 May 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 49/100 for namer, so it is the safer default.

Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for namer.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+497 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [namer](https://selfhost.directory/project/namer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/namer.md)
- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/namer-vs-pi-hole