# namer vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | namer | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #19 of 34 in File Management | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 332 | 393 307 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 883 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 37 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.19.20 · 25 May 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 49/100 for namer, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for namer.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 883 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [namer](https://selfhost.directory/project/namer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/namer.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/namer-vs-openclaw