# namer vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | namer | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #19 of 34 in File Management | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 332 | 93 190 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +57 916 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.19.20 · 25 May 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 49/100 for namer, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for namer.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 916 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [namer](https://selfhost.directory/project/namer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/namer.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/namer-vs-omnivoice-studio