# n8n vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | n8n | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 208 880 ✓ | 15 905 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 071 ✓ | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 205 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | n8n@3.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

n8n scores 92/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

n8n ships more often: 205 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; n8n needs more configuration.

n8n is growing faster right now (+3 071 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [n8n](https://selfhost.directory/project/n8n) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/n8n.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/n8n-vs-transfersh