# n8n vs RapidForge

> Two self-hosted [Workflow Automation projects](https://selfhost.directory/workflow-automation), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | n8n | RapidForge |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 ✓ | 37/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #27 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 208 896 ✓ | 44 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 087 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 205 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | n8n@3.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.15.0 · 2 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

n8n scores 92/100 against 37/100 for RapidForge, so it is the safer default.

n8n ships more often: 205 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for RapidForge.

If you want the quickest setup, RapidForge is easier to run; n8n needs more configuration.

n8n is growing faster right now (+3 087 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [n8n](https://selfhost.directory/project/n8n) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/n8n.md)
- [RapidForge](https://selfhost.directory/project/rapidforge) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rapidforge.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/n8n-vs-rapidforge