# n8n vs QMReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | n8n | QMReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 208 910 ✓ | 261 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 101 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 205 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | n8n@3.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.0.14 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

n8n scores 92/100 against 47/100 for QMReader, so it is the safer default.

n8n ships more often: 205 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for QMReader.

n8n is growing faster right now (+3 101 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [n8n](https://selfhost.directory/project/n8n) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/n8n.md)
- [QMReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/qmreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qmreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/n8n-vs-qmreader