# MusicGrabber vs Musicseerr

> Two self-hosted [Lidarr alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/lidarr), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MusicGrabber | Musicseerr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #9 of 31 in Music | #8 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | — | 1 512 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +93 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.15.0 · 20 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | unlicense | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | — | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Musicseerr scores 64/100 against 58/100 for MusicGrabber, so it is the safer default.

Musicseerr ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for MusicGrabber.

If you want the quickest setup, MusicGrabber is easier to run; Musicseerr needs more configuration.

Musicseerr is growing faster right now (+93 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MusicGrabber](https://selfhost.directory/project/musicgrabber) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/musicgrabber.md)
- [Musicseerr](https://selfhost.directory/project/musicseerr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/musicseerr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/musicgrabber-vs-musicseerr