MusicBotvspaperclip
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MusicBot | paperclip | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 31 in Music | #4 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 5 776 | 108 536 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +11 | +25 712 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
paperclip scores 88/100 against 67/100 for MusicBot, so it is the safer default.
paperclip ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for MusicBot.
If you want the quickest setup, MusicBot is easier to run; paperclip needs more configuration.
paperclip is growing faster right now (+25 712 stars in 30 days).
MusicBot details →paperclip details →
Swap a project
Keep MusicBot, compare it with
Keep paperclip, compare it with