MusicBotvsOpenWrt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MusicBot | OpenWrt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 31 in Music | #1 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 5 775 | 28 971 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 | +458 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Java | C |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 67/100 for MusicBot, so it is the safer default.
OpenWrt ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for MusicBot.
If you want the quickest setup, MusicBot is easier to run; OpenWrt needs more configuration.
OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+458 stars in 30 days).
MusicBot details →OpenWrt details →
Swap a project
Keep MusicBot, compare it with
Keep OpenWrt, compare it with