MusicBotvsNodeLink
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MusicBot | NodeLink | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 31 in Music | #7 of 14 in Audio Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 5 774 | 162 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +11 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v3.9.0 · 14 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
MusicBot scores 67/100 against 50/100 for NodeLink, so it is the safer default.
NodeLink ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for MusicBot.
If you want the quickest setup, MusicBot is easier to run; NodeLink needs more configuration.
MusicBot is growing faster right now (+11 stars in 30 days).
MusicBot details →NodeLink details →
Swap a project
Keep MusicBot, compare it with
Keep NodeLink, compare it with