# music-geshizhuanhuan vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | music-geshizhuanhuan | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 59/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 15 in Audio Processing | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 231 | 550 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.1.0 · 25 Aug 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenReader scores 59/100 against 43/100 for music-geshizhuanhuan, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for music-geshizhuanhuan.

If you want the quickest setup, music-geshizhuanhuan is easier to run; OpenReader needs more configuration.

OpenReader is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [music-geshizhuanhuan](https://selfhost.directory/project/music-geshizhuanhuan) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/music-geshizhuanhuan.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/music-geshizhuanhuan-vs-openreader