# Music Assistant vs qm-music

> Two self-hosted [Music Streaming projects](https://selfhost.directory/music-streaming), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Music Assistant | qm-music |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 59 in Music Streaming | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 3 253 ✓ | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +145 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 45 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | 2.11.0b7 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Music Assistant scores 71/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

Music Assistant ships more often: 45 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.

If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; Music Assistant needs more configuration.

Music Assistant is growing faster right now (+145 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Music Assistant](https://selfhost.directory/project/music-assistant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/music-assistant.md)
- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/music-assistant-vs-qm-music