MunkiReportvsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MunkiReport | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 11 in Device Management | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 408 | 56 878 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +149 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 5 |
| Latest release | v5.8.2 · 5 Oct 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 55/100 for MunkiReport, so it is the safer default.
Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for MunkiReport.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; MunkiReport needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+149 stars in 30 days).
MunkiReport details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep MunkiReport, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with