MunkiReportvsopenclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MunkiReport | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 11 in Device Management | #1 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 408 | 393 322 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 898 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 37 |
| Latest release | v5.8.2 · 5 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 55/100 for MunkiReport, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for MunkiReport.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 898 stars in 30 days).
MunkiReport details →openclaw details →
Swap a project
Keep MunkiReport, compare it with
Keep openclaw, compare it with