# MunkiReport vs Octoprint

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MunkiReport | Octoprint |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 11 in Device Management | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 408 | 9 167 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +59 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | v5.8.2 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Octoprint scores 73/100 against 55/100 for MunkiReport, so it is the safer default.

Octoprint ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for MunkiReport.

Octoprint is growing faster right now (+59 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MunkiReport](https://selfhost.directory/project/munkireport) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/munkireport.md)
- [Octoprint](https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octoprint.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/munkireport-vs-octoprint