# multiwoven vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | multiwoven | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 8 in Data Pipeline | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 1 683 | 17 184 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.136.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 57/100 for multiwoven, so it is the safer default.

multiwoven ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; multiwoven needs more configuration.

multiwoven is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [multiwoven](https://selfhost.directory/project/multiwoven) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/multiwoven.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/multiwoven-vs-upptime