multiwovenvsPi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| multiwoven | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 8 in Data Pipeline | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 1 683 | 61 548 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +486 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.136.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Ruby | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 57/100 for multiwoven, so it is the safer default.
multiwoven ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; multiwoven needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+486 stars in 30 days).
multiwoven details →Pi-hole details →
Swap a project
Keep multiwoven, compare it with
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with