# multiwoven vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | multiwoven | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 8 in Data Pipeline | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 1 683 | 393 300 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +2 876 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 37 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.136.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 57/100 for multiwoven, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 26 for multiwoven.

If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; multiwoven needs more configuration.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 876 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [multiwoven](https://selfhost.directory/project/multiwoven) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/multiwoven.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/multiwoven-vs-openclaw