multicavsWhirl
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| multica | Whirl | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 125 in AI | #23 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 54 130 | 510 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 888 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 87 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
multica scores 84/100 against 52/100 for Whirl, so it is the safer default.
multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Whirl.
If you want the quickest setup, multica is easier to run; Whirl needs more configuration.
multica is growing faster right now (+2 888 stars in 30 days).
multica details →Whirl details →
Swap a project
Keep multica, compare it with
Keep Whirl, compare it with