# multica vs UglyFeed

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | multica | UglyFeed |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 125 in AI | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 54 158 ✓ | 323 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 850 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 87 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.0.52 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

multica scores 84/100 against 44/100 for UglyFeed, so it is the safer default.

multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for UglyFeed.

multica is growing faster right now (+2 850 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [multica](https://selfhost.directory/project/multica) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/multica.md)
- [UglyFeed](https://selfhost.directory/project/uglyfeed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uglyfeed.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/multica-vs-uglyfeed