# multica vs trigger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | multica | trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 125 in AI | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 54 090 ✓ | 16 641 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 848 ✓ | +254 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 87 ✓ | 49 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

multica scores 84/100 against 76/100 for trigger, so it is the safer default.

multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 49 for trigger.

If you want the quickest setup, multica is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.

multica is growing faster right now (+2 848 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [multica](https://selfhost.directory/project/multica) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/multica.md)
- [trigger](https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/multica-vs-trigger