# multica vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | multica | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 125 in AI | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 54 106 ✓ | 15 908 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 864 ✓ | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 87 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

multica scores 84/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; multica needs more configuration.

multica is growing faster right now (+2 864 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [multica](https://selfhost.directory/project/multica) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/multica.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/multica-vs-transfersh