multicavstransfer.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| multica | transfer.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 125 in AI | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 54 106 | 15 908 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 864 | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 87 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
multica scores 84/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.
multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; multica needs more configuration.
multica is growing faster right now (+2 864 stars in 30 days).
multica details →transfer.sh details →
Swap a project
Keep multica, compare it with
Keep transfer.sh, compare it with