multicavsTinystatus
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| multica | Tinystatus | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 125 in AI | #37 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 54 158 | 515 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 850 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 87 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
multica scores 84/100 against 45/100 for Tinystatus, so it is the safer default.
multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tinystatus.
If you want the quickest setup, Tinystatus is easier to run; multica needs more configuration.
multica is growing faster right now (+2 850 stars in 30 days).
multica details →Tinystatus details →
Swap a project
Keep multica, compare it with
Keep Tinystatus, compare it with