# multica vs Tidal Echo

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | multica | Tidal Echo |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 125 in AI | #61 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 54 174 ✓ | 329 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 866 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 87 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | HTML |

## Which one should you pick?

multica scores 84/100 against 47/100 for Tidal Echo, so it is the safer default.

multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tidal Echo.

If you want the quickest setup, multica is easier to run; Tidal Echo needs more configuration.

multica is growing faster right now (+2 866 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [multica](https://selfhost.directory/project/multica) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/multica.md)
- [Tidal Echo](https://selfhost.directory/project/tidal-echo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tidal-echo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/multica-vs-tidal-echo