# multica vs Tdarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | multica | Tdarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 124 in AI | #2 of 18 in Video Processing |
| GitHub stars | 54 244 ✓ | 4 369 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 936 ✓ | +37 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 87 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Go | Makefile |

## Which one should you pick?

multica scores 84/100 against 66/100 for Tdarr, so it is the safer default.

multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tdarr.

If you want the quickest setup, Tdarr is easier to run; multica needs more configuration.

multica is growing faster right now (+2 936 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [multica](https://selfhost.directory/project/multica) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/multica.md)
- [Tdarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/tdarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tdarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/multica-vs-tdarr