multicavsstorj
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| multica | storj | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 124 in AI | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 54 221 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 913 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 87 | 39 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
multica scores 84/100 against 61/100 for storj, so it is the safer default.
multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 39 for storj.
If you want the quickest setup, multica is easier to run; storj needs more configuration.
multica is growing faster right now (+2 913 stars in 30 days).
multica details →storj details →
Swap a project
Keep multica, compare it with
Keep storj, compare it with