# multica vs SonarQube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | multica | SonarQube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 125 in AI | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 54 197 ✓ | 11 122 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 889 ✓ | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 87 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

multica scores 84/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.

multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.

If you want the quickest setup, multica is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.

multica is growing faster right now (+2 889 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [multica](https://selfhost.directory/project/multica) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/multica.md)
- [SonarQube](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/multica-vs-sonarqube