multicavsretroassembly
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| multica | retroassembly | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 124 in AI | #5 of 5 in Emulation |
| GitHub stars | 54 197 | 1 153 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 889 | +72 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 87 | 3 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
multica scores 84/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.
multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.
If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; multica needs more configuration.
multica is growing faster right now (+2 889 stars in 30 days).
multica details →retroassembly details →
Swap a project
Keep multica, compare it with
Keep retroassembly, compare it with