# multica vs rebacklogs

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | multica | rebacklogs |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 125 in AI | #36 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 54 118 ✓ | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 876 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 87 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.3.3 · 6 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Go | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

multica scores 84/100 against 43/100 for rebacklogs, so it is the safer default.

multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for rebacklogs.

multica is growing faster right now (+2 876 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [multica](https://selfhost.directory/project/multica) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/multica.md)
- [rebacklogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/rebacklogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rebacklogs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/multica-vs-rebacklogs