# multica vs ReadMeABook

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | multica | ReadMeABook |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 125 in AI | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 54 123 ✓ | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 881 ✓ | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 87 ✓ | 21 |
| Latest release | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

multica scores 84/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.

multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for ReadMeABook.

If you want the quickest setup, multica is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.

multica is growing faster right now (+2 881 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [multica](https://selfhost.directory/project/multica) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/multica.md)
- [ReadMeABook](https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/multica-vs-readmeabook