# Mularr vs Prysm

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mularr | Prysm |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 65/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 2 in P2P | #2 of 18 in Blockchain |
| GitHub stars | 179 | 3 790 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0 · 7 Oct 2026 | v7.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Prysm scores 65/100 against 45/100 for Mularr, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Mularr is easier to run; Prysm needs more configuration.

Prysm is growing faster right now (+8 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Mularr](https://selfhost.directory/project/mularr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mularr.md)
- [Prysm](https://selfhost.directory/project/prysm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/prysm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mularr-vs-prysm