# Mularr vs PhotoPrism

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Mularr | PhotoPrism |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 2 in P2P | #4 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 179 | 40 373 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +140 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.0.0 · 7 Oct 2026 | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 45/100 for Mularr, so it is the safer default.

Mularr ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PhotoPrism.

PhotoPrism is growing faster right now (+140 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Mularr](https://selfhost.directory/project/mularr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mularr.md)
- [PhotoPrism](https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/photoprism.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mularr-vs-photoprism