# MuckScraper vs RSS-Bridge

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MuckScraper | RSS-Bridge |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 74/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 6 in Feed Aggregator | #1 of 4 in RSS |
| GitHub stars | 159 | 9 321 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +72 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Unlicense |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

RSS-Bridge scores 74/100 against 46/100 for MuckScraper, so it is the safer default.

MuckScraper ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for RSS-Bridge.

If you want the quickest setup, RSS-Bridge is easier to run; MuckScraper needs more configuration.

RSS-Bridge is growing faster right now (+72 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MuckScraper](https://selfhost.directory/project/muckscraper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/muckscraper.md)
- [RSS-Bridge](https://selfhost.directory/project/rss-bridge) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rss-bridge.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/muckscraper-vs-rss-bridge