# MuckScraper vs nocodb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MuckScraper | nocodb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 6 in Feed Aggregator | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 160 | 65 377 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +315 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

nocodb scores 81/100 against 46/100 for MuckScraper, so it is the safer default.

nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for MuckScraper.

If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; MuckScraper needs more configuration.

nocodb is growing faster right now (+315 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MuckScraper](https://selfhost.directory/project/muckscraper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/muckscraper.md)
- [nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nocodb.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs nocodb](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-nocodb)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/muckscraper-vs-nocodb