# MTranServer vs Urbit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MTranServer | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Translation | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 4 731 ✓ | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v5.1.0 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | hoon |

## Which one should you pick?

MTranServer and Urbit score the same (63/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

MTranServer ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.

If you want the quickest setup, MTranServer is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

MTranServer is growing faster right now (+12 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MTranServer](https://selfhost.directory/project/mtranserver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mtranserver.md)
- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mtranserver-vs-urbit