# MTranServer vs SyncTube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | MTranServer | SyncTube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 9 in Translation | #16 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 4 731 ✓ | 395 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.1.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Haxe |

## Which one should you pick?

MTranServer scores 63/100 against 51/100 for SyncTube, so it is the safer default.

MTranServer ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SyncTube.

If you want the quickest setup, MTranServer is easier to run; SyncTube needs more configuration.

MTranServer is growing faster right now (+12 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [MTranServer](https://selfhost.directory/project/mtranserver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mtranserver.md)
- [SyncTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/synctube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/synctube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/mtranserver-vs-synctube